The proof ships with the claim. Every release is downloadable as an audit package: the corpus snapshot, the weights, the per-work breakdowns, and the one command that reproduces the ranking. If you cannot rebuild the rank from the package, the release is defective.
This release
version pilot-v0.3 · corpus_hash cd8459a70755fa3e60ed00e8 · method_version 0.1-pilot
Metrics: 326 (citation_count: 163, readership_persistence: 163); declared gaps: 64.
Downloads
The audit bundle below contains everything (code, weights, pinned data, all rankings, and every per-work breakdown). The individual files are listed for convenience.
Audit package
- audit-bundle.zip, the self-contained offline package: pipeline code, weights, pinned data, release outputs, and a one-command reproduce script. Rebuild this release with no repo and no network.
- release.json, the governance record
- coverage.json, declared gaps
Rankings (Top-50 per scenario)
The corpus, as open data
- books.json · books.csv, 610 books
- papers.json · papers.csv, 269 papers
- persons.json, 184 voices
- orgs.json, 133 organizations
- platforms.json, 90 platforms
Per-work breakdowns (one file per scored work) are inside the audit bundle.
Reproduce
make install && make assemble && make release && make verify-release
The last command rebuilds this release from the pinned inputs and asserts the corpus_hash and rankings are bit-identical. A mismatch means the release is defective, and we want the challenge.
License
The pipeline code is MIT. The corpus and data downloads above are CC BY 4.0 (attribution: The AI Canon, Apparens). One exception: the verbatim paper abstracts remain the copyright of their authors and publishers, are quoted with their source so each paper can speak for itself, and are not covered by the CC BY grant. Rights holders can have an abstract removed on request: office@apparens.nl.