Score breakdown

The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines

paper-0117 · paper · 2019

Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca, Effy Vayena

Mapped 84 guidelines; showed convergence on principles and divergence on practice.

Academic, score -0.1886

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent5053.00.0227410.50.011371OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.1recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.050.025OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Broad Influence, score 0.0045

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent5053.00.0227410.20.004548OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.40.2OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.2693

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent5053.00.0227410.250.005685OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.10.05OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.