Score breakdown

Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations

paper-0115 · paper · 2019

Ziad Obermeyer et al.

Showed a deployed health algorithm systematically disadvantaged Black patients.

Academic, score -0.1861

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent6155.00.0277020.50.013851OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.1recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.050.025OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Broad Influence, score 0.0055

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent6155.00.0277020.20.00554OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.40.2OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.2681

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent6155.00.0277020.250.006925OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent8.00.50.10.05OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.