Score breakdown

The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate

paper-0090 · paper · 2016

Brent Mittelstadt et al.

The standard map of algorithmic-ethics concerns.

Academic, score -0.1862

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent2937.00.0132160.50.006608OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.1recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent10.00.6428570.050.032143OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Broad Influence, score 0.0598

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent2937.00.0132160.20.002643OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent10.00.6428570.40.257143OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.2574

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent2937.00.0132160.250.003304OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent10.00.6428570.10.064286OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.