Score breakdown

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data

paper-0055 · paper · 2009

Alon Halevy, Peter Norvig, Fernando Pereira

Data beats cleverness; the empirical creed of the scaling era, stated early.

Broad Influence, score 0.2016

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent1792.00.0080660.20.001613OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.40.4OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.2230

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent1792.00.0080660.250.002017OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.10.1OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.