Score breakdown

Fuzzy Sets

paper-0012 · paper · 1965

Lotfi A. Zadeh

Founded fuzzy logic; a major non-probabilistic approach to reasoning under vagueness.

Academic, score -0.0261

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent66152.00.2977750.50.148888OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.1recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.050.05OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Broad Influence, score 0.2596

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent66152.00.2977750.20.059555OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.40.4OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.1506

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent66152.00.2977750.250.074444OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.10.1OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.